Hoogheemraadschap Rijnland
OAR 11, 12, 13 : 1253 - 1564
previous Document Type summaries View: Document Type
"Rechtsdag"
next Document Type summaries

 

 

 

 

Rechtsdag    Year  Next Year  
  1426  
Date Summary Rec details
1426.00.00 Testimony taken in inquest done at Lisse into the matter of water being allowed to drain into Rijnland because several had dug through a dune at the request of the houtvesters -- possibly to relieve flooding.
 
see record details

 

Rechtsdag Prev Year  Year  Next Year  
  1431  
Date Summary Rec details
1431.00.00 List of individuals banished in 1431
 
see record details

 

Rechtsdag Prev Year  Year  Next Year  
  1434  
Date Summary Rec details
1434.05.00 Testimony in a dispute taken by heemraad Meynert Claeszoon concerning the priest Jan Allertsz. of Spaarnwoude who was charged with using more land for the church than he was authorized to use. In early 1430, priest Jan and associates had agreed to rebuild the badly damaged Kerkendijk at Spaarnwoude.
 
see record details

 

Rechtsdag Prev Year  Year  Next Year  
  1437  
Date Summary Rec details
1437.02.26 Lijsbet Mandemakers is pardoned for something not specified.
 
see record details
Date Summary Rec details
1437.06.25 Testimony concerning land against which a lien had been placed because of prescribed maintenance work left undone.
 
see record details
Date Summary Rec details
1437.ca Dijkgraaf and heemraden deal with a man named Pau or Prager, imprisoned for damages he did to ditches and turnstiles between Amsterdam and Spaarndam: because of his poverty and show or remorse, his punishment is relieved with the warning that if he ever does anything against the heemraden or Rijnland again, he will forfeit life and property and be banished from Rijnland and all of Holland
 
see record details
Date Summary Rec details
1437.ca Testimony and a decision in a dispute between Tielman van Buschusen and the ambacht of Zoeterwoude concening whether or not Zoeterwoude had paid Tielman the amount to be collected but which was never turned over to the clerk of Rijnland. Because a credible witness sided with Zoeterwoude, so did the hoogheemraden.
 
see record details
Date Summary Rec details
1437.ca Testomony and a decision in a dispute between Tielman van Buschusen and the ambacht of Leiderdorp concening whether or not Leiderdorp had paid Tielman the amount to be collected but which was never turned over to the clerk of Rijnland. Because the witness sided with Tielman, do did the hoogheemraden, though Leiderdorp could appeal the decision with new evidence within eight days.
 
see record details

 

Rechtsdag Prev Year  Year  Next Year  
  1446  
Date Summary Rec details
1446.06.28 Take testimony in a dispute between the residents of Alphen and those of Randenburg, Groenswaard, and Snijdelwijk concerning maintenance requirements in the Gouwesluis at Alphen, with a copy of an old charter from 1284 brought into play
 
see record details

 

Rechtsdag Prev Year  Year     
  1449  
Date Summary Rec details
1449.05.29 Unless she repays twice the amount of money that the schout of Vriesekoop put up on her behalf, Geertruyt Geryt Goemen will be banned from Rijnland.
 
see record details
Date Summary Rec details
1449.05.29 Six men banned from Rijnland until they pay double the amount that the dijkgraaf put out on their behalf.
 
see record details

 

 

Author Publication Home
William H. TeBrake
Maine, USA, June 2006
Rijnland
OAR11, OAR12, OAR13
www.oudleiden.nl