| Hoogheemraadschap Rijnland OAR 11, 12, 13 : 1253 - 1564 |
||
 |
View: Document Type "Rechtsdag" |
 |
| Record Type | |||||
| Besteding | Beveling | Brief | Consent | Keur | Rechtsdag |
| Scheiding | Schouwdag | Verklaring | Vonnis | Walen | |
| Years for type "Rechtsdag" | |||||
| 1426 | 1431 | 1434 | 1437 | 1446 | 1449 |
| Rechtsdag | Year  |
|
| 1426 | ||
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1426.00.00 | Testimony taken in inquest done at Lisse into the matter of water being allowed to drain into Rijnland because several had dug through a dune at the request of the houtvesters -- possibly to relieve flooding. |
|
| Rechtsdag |  Year |
|
| 1431 | ||
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1431.00.00 | List of individuals banished in 1431 |
|
| Rechtsdag | Year |
|
| 1434 | ||
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1434.05.00 | Testimony in a dispute taken by heemraad Meynert Claeszoon concerning the priest Jan Allertsz. of Spaarnwoude who was charged with using more land for the church than he was authorized to use. In early 1430, priest Jan and associates had agreed to rebuild the badly damaged Kerkendijk at Spaarnwoude. |
|
| Rechtsdag | Year |
|
| 1437 | ||
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1437.02.26 | Lijsbet Mandemakers is pardoned for something not specified. |
|
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1437.06.25 | Testimony concerning land against which a lien had been placed because of prescribed maintenance work left undone. |
|
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1437.ca | Dijkgraaf and heemraden deal with a man named Pau or Prager, imprisoned for damages he did to ditches and turnstiles between Amsterdam and Spaarndam: because of his poverty and show or remorse, his punishment is relieved with the warning that if he ever does anything against the heemraden or Rijnland again, he will forfeit life and property and be banished from Rijnland and all of Holland |
|
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1437.ca | Testimony and a decision in a dispute between Tielman van Buschusen and the ambacht of Zoeterwoude concening whether or not Zoeterwoude had paid Tielman the amount to be collected but which was never turned over to the clerk of Rijnland. Because a credible witness sided with Zoeterwoude, so did the hoogheemraden. |
|
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1437.ca | Testomony and a decision in a dispute between Tielman van Buschusen and the ambacht of Leiderdorp concening whether or not Leiderdorp had paid Tielman the amount to be collected but which was never turned over to the clerk of Rijnland. Because the witness sided with Tielman, do did the hoogheemraden, though Leiderdorp could appeal the decision with new evidence within eight days. |
|
| Rechtsdag | Year |
|
| 1446 | ||
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1446.06.28 | Take testimony in a dispute between the residents of Alphen and those of Randenburg, Groenswaard, and Snijdelwijk concerning maintenance requirements in the Gouwesluis at Alphen, with a copy of an old charter from 1284 brought into play |
|
| Rechtsdag | Year |
|
| 1449 | ||
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1449.05.29 | Unless she repays twice the amount of money that the schout of Vriesekoop put up on her behalf, Geertruyt Geryt Goemen will be banned from Rijnland. |
|
| Date | Summary | Rec details |
| 1449.05.29 | Six men banned from Rijnland until they pay double the amount that the dijkgraaf put out on their behalf. |
|
| Years for type "Rechtsdag" | |||||
| 1426 | 1431 | 1434 | 1437 | 1446 | 1449 |
| Author | Publication | Home |
| William H. TeBrake Maine, USA, June 2006 |
Rijnland OAR11, OAR12, OAR13 |
www.oudleiden.nl |